Illustration of a B‑tree node beside an LSM tree log segment.

Why B‑Trees Outperform LSM Trees for Read‑Heavy Workloads

A deep dive into the structural differences that make B‑trees superior for read‑intensive scenarios, backed by benchmarks and real‑world engineering insights.

May 13, 2026 · 7 min · 1368 words · martinuke0
Illustration of a B-Tree branching with copy-on-write overlays.

Why Copy-on-Write B-Trees Improve Database Concurrency Control

Copy-on-Write B‑Trees provide immutable snapshots for readers while writers work on new nodes, enabling high concurrency with minimal blocking.

May 13, 2026 · 7 min · 1364 words · martinuke0
Illustration of a Linux process tree with shared memory pages.

How Copy-on-Write Optimizes Linux Process Creation

Copy‑on‑write lets the kernel clone a process without copying its memory pages, deferring duplication until a write occurs, which dramatically speeds up fork.

May 13, 2026 · 7 min · 1383 words · martinuke0
Illustration of a log‑structured merge tree with multiple levels

Optimizing Write Throughput with Log-Structured Merge Trees

A deep dive into LSM‑tree internals, compaction strategies, and configuration knobs that let you squeeze maximum write performance from modern storage engines.

May 13, 2026 · 7 min · 1305 words · martinuke0
Illustration of a copy-on-write B-tree with versioned nodes.

Why Copy-on-Write B-Trees Accelerate Database Snapshots

This article explains how copy‑on‑write B‑trees work, why they speed up database snapshots, and what trade‑offs developers should consider.

May 13, 2026 · 9 min · 1742 words · martinuke0
Feedback