Diagram of a B‑tree node split during a copy‑on‑write operation.

Why Copy-on-Write B-Trees Outperform Traditional In-Place Updates

An in‑depth look at why copy‑on‑write B‑trees beat traditional in‑place updates, covering algorithmic details, performance metrics, and practical deployment tips.

May 14, 2026 · 8 min · 1671 words · martinuke0
Illustration of a B‑tree node being duplicated for a snapshot.

Why Copy-on-Write B-Trees Enable Atomic Database Snapshots

Copy‑on‑write B‑trees let databases capture point‑in‑time snapshots without blocking writers, enabling true atomic reads and fast recovery.

May 13, 2026 · 6 min · 1215 words · martinuke0
Diagram of a B-tree node being duplicated for copy‑on‑write.

How Copy-on-Write B-Trees Enable Instant Database Snapshots

Copy‑on‑write B‑trees let databases take point‑in‑time snapshots instantly, without blocking writes. This post explains the mechanics, trade‑offs, and real‑world implementations.

May 13, 2026 · 8 min · 1573 words · martinuke0
Diagram of a database log file with arrows showing write-ahead logging flow.

Why Write-Ahead Logging Prevents Database Corruption During Crashes

Write-ahead logging (WAL) writes changes to a durable log before modifying the database, allowing recovery after crashes and eliminating corruption.

May 13, 2026 · 8 min · 1673 words · martinuke0
Illustration of a B‑tree node beside an LSM tree log segment.

Why B‑Trees Outperform LSM Trees for Read‑Heavy Workloads

A deep dive into the structural differences that make B‑trees superior for read‑intensive scenarios, backed by benchmarks and real‑world engineering insights.

May 13, 2026 · 7 min · 1368 words · martinuke0
Feedback